Saturday, April 15, 2006

Arguments and Challenges for Integration:

‘Integration’ as described in Berry’s acculturation model is the fairest form of acculturation possible within the theoretical frame works discussed. It allows immigrants to maintain both the cultures satisfactorily. However, this model prescribes the structural and cultural dimensions as two distinct and separate entities. Theoretically this may be possible. While considering the operational dimension, the immigrants may not differentiate these aspects nor agree that attaining either one independent of the other is possible..
It may be noted that in Gordon’s argument, he says structural assimilation is the corner stone and once it is achieved everything else would follow. This is in fact a disputable observation. While reviewing the literature, other theorists have pointed out that, other parts of integration need not necessarily be sequential. In the present study, the researcher proposes to assess whether acculturation is possible without participation in economic and productive enterprise and vice versa.
A third area of observation is in the present context of globalized economy, many researchers feel that a dominant culture with emphasize on economic activity will only survive. At the same time considering the possibility of movements within a transnational space, many new comers may follow either a dual culture or a hybrid culture as suggested by Kuran and Sandholm. However, this depends on the immigrant’s attitudes, perceptions on his/her social capital and cultural sensitivity.
Though the literature gives an abstract idea about racialization and discrimination, south Asian immigrants may have a different story to tell. On one hand there may be feelings of exclusion, oppression by the dominant groups, the researcher anticipates possibility of expressions of internalized oppression, and there may even be stories of oppression from within the immigrant community itself.
There has been a number of studies on ethnic communities and their process of integration into the mainstream of the Canadian social and economic life. However, studies` looking at the perspective of integration in relation to the cultural identity of immigrants are very limited except a few focussing on the immigrant communities from India by Somerville, (2004). She studied the process of identity formation within a transnational social field, specifically examining the second generation of south Indians. But it was limited to the Canadian born children of early immigrants.
Conclusion:
The focus of this research is on recent immigrants to the country who are skilled and highly qualified and facing the reality of integration will be a refreshing exposure. Moreover, no such studies have been reported in relation to the experiences of those immigrants from Kerala who speak Malayalam as their native tongue. Hence, this highly interpretive study is expected to contribute new knowledge on the emerging ethnic and cultural differences within the main stream communities from India. It would help practicing social workers that work with new communities and the marginalized groups.
However, the researcher does not underestimate the limitation of the sample, which may not be cent percent representative.
For social work, this is a relevant area as it fits well within its practice realms of helping individuals for better adaptation, working with marginalized people, fighting oppression, advocacy for social justice etc and some of the issues like social exclusion referred under discussion, therefore opens up new avenues for research and provide new knowledge for practicing social workers and academia. It will help in out-reaching and educating immigrant communities on the current discourse on social inclusion. Though the coverage is small, this study will bring out more insights on individual and collective perceptions of exclusion and strategies for inclusion.
As a larger objective, the researcher expects the study to bring socially isolated people together on common grounds and on the basis of needs and validate their experiences and facilitate a creative and critical reflection. On a wider platform, individualized or personal experiences will be contextualized.








REFERENCES:

Pendakur, Aizlewood, Amanda &, Ravi. (2005). Ethnicity and Social Capital in Canada.
Canadian Ethnic Studies Journal, 37.2: p 77.
Berry, J. W. (1990). Psychology of acculturation. In Berman, J. (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation

and Cross-cultural perspectives, 1989, pp. 201-234. Lincoln, NE: Nebraska University Press.
Berry, J.W. (1992) Acculturation and Adaptation in a New Society. In International Migration, Vol.30: pp. 69-85.
Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation and adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46, 5-68.
Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., Segall, M. H. and Dasen, P. R. (1992). Cross-cultural Psychology: Research and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bhatia, S., & Ram, A. (2001). Rethinking acculturation in relation to Diaspora cultures and postcolonial

identities. Human Development, 44, 1-18.
Chatterjee, A., Dasmohapatra, S., & Shakir, (2004) Insurgent Communities: South
Asian Construction of Social Inclusion; Council of Agencies Serving South Asians (CASSA), Toronto. Retrieved on-line on 16th Mar, 2006.from www.cassa.on.ca/APG.
Choudhry, U.K. (2001). Uprooting and Resettlement Experiences of South Asian Immigrant Women; Western Journal of Nursing Research, June 2001,Vol. 23, No.4
Diamantaras, D and Swanson, C.E, (2004) Competing Cultures and Output. Philadelphia: Dept of Economics, Temple University. Retrieved on 2nd March 2006 from
http://www.lebow.drexel.edu/lainczc/Culture-Diamantaras-Swanson-Nov-2004.pdf.
Encyclopaedia Wikipaedia, (2005). ‘Melting Pot’, Online retrieved on 3rd Dec, 2005 from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/meltingpot
Entzinger, H., and Biezveld, R., (2003). Benchmarking in Immigrant Integration; Report of the European

Research Centre on Migration and Ethnic Relations. Erasmus University, Rotterdam.
Faist, T., (2000). The Volume and Dynamics of International Migration and Transnational Social Spaces; Oxford, Clarendon.
Feng, H, & Balakrishnan, T.R (1996) The Integration of Visible Minorities in Contemporary Canadian Society. Canadian Journal of Sociology, Vol. 21.Iss.3
Fontana, J, (2003) Settlement and Integration: A sense of belonging – "Feeling At Home", report of the Standing committee on Citizenship and Immigration, Retrieved online from www.parl.gc.ca.
Forbes, D. (2005), Canadian Theories of Multi-culturalism. Ethnic, Immigration and Pluralism studies; University of Toronto.Retrieved 20th March, 2006 from
http://www.utoronto.ca/ethnicstudies/Forbes_Multiculturalism.pdf.
Gordon, M. M. (1964) Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion and National origins. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hoskin, M. (1991) New Immigrants and Democratic Society: Minority Integration in Western Democracies: London, Praeger Publishers.
Hyman, I., Yu, N., & Beiser, M. (2000). Post-migration stresses among Southeast Asian refugee youth in

Canada: A research note. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 31, 281-293.
Kazemipur, A., (2004). Social Capital of Immigrants in Canada:
Working paper by PCERII, Lethbridge, University of Lethbridge.
Kuran, T. & Sandholm, W.H., 2002. "
Cultural integration and its discontents," Working paper 20, Wisconsin Madison - Social Systems.Research Institute, Retrieved on 1st March, 2006, from http://www.ssc.wisc.edu/~whs/research/ci.pdf
Laquian, L., Laquain.A. , T.McGee (1999). Silent Debate: Asian Immigration and
Racism In Canada, Eds. Vancouver: The University of British Columbia.Institute of Asian Research.
Lazear, E.P, (1999) " Culture and Language". Journal of Political Economy, 107 (6), S95 S126.
Li, P.S. (2002). ‘Social Inclusion of visible minorities and new comers: The articulation of ‘Race’ and racial difference in Canadian Society’ Paper presented at the conference
of social development on social inclusion; March 27-28, 2003, Ottawa.
May, D. (2003) ‘Theories of Integration Revisited: Towards an Interactive Model of Integration strategies’ Research paper presented at 6th ESA Conference, Sept- 2003, Spain,
Denmark, AMID- Academy for Migration studies in Denmark
Microsoft® Encarta® Online Encyclopedia (2005) "Acculturation," Retrieved online on
3rd Dec.05 from http://encarta.msn.com © 1997-2005 Microsoft Corporation.
Mullaly, B (2002) Challenging Oppression- A Critical Social Work Approach, Oxford, University press. p.59-60.
Nimmagadda, J., & Balagopal, R.P., (2000). Social Work Practice with Asian Immigrants, In Balagopal, R.P, (Ed) Social Work Practice with Immigrants and Refugees, Columbia
University Press.
Noguer, M; & Siscart, M., (2003): "Language as a Barrier to International Trade? An Empirical Investigation," New York University typescript New York: Columbia University Press. pp.30-64.
Pennsylvania Ethnic Heritage Studies Center , University of Pittsburgh, (2005)
Immigration - A cultural perspective in Globalization and the New Migration: Retrieved on 03/16/06 from www.ucis.pitt.edu/pehsc/
Ray, B., (2005). Canada: Policy Changes and Integration Challenges in an Increasingly Diverse Society; Migration Information Source. Retrieved on line on 17th March, 2006
from http://www.migrationinformation.org/.
Rubinstein, A. (2000): Economics and Language. New York, Cambridge University Press.
Sam, D. L. and Berry, J. W. (1995). Acculturative stress among young immigrants in Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 36, 10-24.
Smart, J. F. & Smart, D. W. (1995). Acculturative stress of Hispanics: Loss and Challenge. Journal of

Counseling and Development, 73, 390-396.
Somerville, K. (2004). The Process of Identity Formation within a Transnational Social Field: An Examination of Second Generation South Indians. Unpublished Research paper, University
of Toronto.
Tran, K, Kaddatz, J & Allard, A., (2005) South Asians in Canada: Unity through
Diversity, Canadian Social Trends, Statistics Canada Catalogue 11-008, pp.20-25.
Tucci, I., (2005). Explaining Attitudes towards Immigration: New Pieces to the
Puzzle.Research paper published by DIW, Berlin and LASMAS idL, Paris
Zangeneh, M., Nouroozifar, M & Kantini, E (2004) Acculturation Stress and Drug Use Among Iranian Youth. Shiraz E-Medical Journal, ISSN: 1735-1391Vol-5,No.3. Retrieved online on 18th March, 2006 from
http://semj.sums.ac.ir/

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home